Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept—it’s already reshaping healthcare.
From diagnostics to workflow optimization, AI offers physicians powerful tools to improve patient care. But with innovation comes complexity. How can physicians begin using AI responsibly, effectively, and ethically? This guide explores the key questions clinicians should ask before integrating AI into their practice.
Clinical Utility and Safety
Artificial intelligence continues to demonstrate transformative potential in healthcare diagnostics. In oncology and cardiology, deep learning models now outperform traditional methods in interpreting imaging and genomic data, enabling earlier detection and personalized treatment. In critical care, AI models like Random Forest and XGBoost are reliably predicting sepsis, mortality, and readmissions using structured EHR data.
However, clinical utility still hinges on robust validation. A 2025 review found that while AI models excel in controlled environments, many lack generalizability due to single-center training datasets. Hybrid approaches—combining ensemble and deep learning methods—are emerging as best practice for handling diverse healthcare data.
Ethics, Privacy, and Liability
Ethical deployment of AI in healthcare now centers on trustworthiness, transparency, and governance. The 2025 FUTURE-AI framework outlines international consensus guidelines for developing and deploying trustworthy AI tools, emphasizing fairness, sustainability, and clinician oversight.
Privacy remains a top concern. AI systems must comply with HIPAA and GDPR, and new frameworks like the Regulatory Genome propose adaptive oversight aligned with global policy trends. Liability is also evolving: Stanford’s 2025 testimony to Congress recommends requiring healthcare organizations to disclose AI risks and maintain governance processes that meet national standards.
Bias mitigation is advancing. Recent studies emphasize quantifiable trust metrics and interdisciplinary oversight to ensure fairness across diverse populations.
Integration into Workflow
AI is increasingly embedded into clinical workflows, especially through ambient documentation, predictive diagnostics, and patient engagement tools. CIOs now treat AI agents as part of the workforce, integrating them into org charts to secure budget and recognition.
Yet, explainability remains critical. Clinicians demand transparency in decision-making, and frameworks like FUTURE-AI and Regulatory Genome are helping bridge the gap between technical performance and clinical trust.
Training is essential. The 2025 Wolters Kluwer survey found that fewer than 20% of healthcare organizations have published GenAI policies or require staff training, highlighting a major readiness gap.
Cost, Access, and Reimbursement
AI adoption is accelerating, but reimbursement models lag. While CMS has begun reimbursing select AI-enabled services, many tools still lack clear payment pathways. Stanford’s 2025 policy testimony recommends modifying reimbursement structures to support monitoring and ethical deployment of AI tools.
Smaller practices face resource constraints, but scalable, resource-efficient AI tools—like mobile diagnostics and wearable biosensors—are helping bridge the gap in low-resource settings.
Future and Adoption
AI is advancing rapidly, but it’s not replacing clinicians. Instead, it’s augmenting their capabilities. Specialties like radiology, pathology, and dermatology are leading the way, with hundreds of FDA-cleared AI tools. In pathology, AI-assisted workflows have cut slide review time in half while improving cancer detection rates.
Regulatory oversight is catching up. The FDA has approved over 1,250 AI-enabled devices, mostly through the 510(k) pathway. However, few tools use generative AI or large language models, highlighting the need for updated frameworks.
Cyber Insurance: A Safety Net for AI Adoption
As physicians adopt AI tools, they face new risks—especially around data privacy, system failures, and liability. AI systems often rely on vast amounts of protected health information (PHI), making them prime targets for cyberattacks. For example, in 2023 alone, over 87 million patients had their data breached—more than double the 37 million affected in 2022 (TDWI, 2023). These incidents can disrupt care, damage reputations, and lead to costly fines.
Cyber insurance is emerging as a critical safeguard. It helps cover financial losses from data breaches, ransomware, and business interruptions linked to AI failures. However, not all policies automatically include AI-related risks. Many older malpractice or cyber insurance plans exclude AI-specific incidents or offer limited coverage. Physicians should work with brokers who understand AI liability and ensure their policies explicitly cover AI tools.
Specialized products like Munich Re’s aiSelf now address AI-specific risks such as model drift and algorithmic errors. These policies can protect against operational disruptions, regulatory fines, and even lawsuits stemming from biased or inaccurate AI outputs.
Cyber insurance also incentivizes better security practices. Insurers often require healthcare organizations to implement strong protections—like encryption, multi-factor authentication, and HITRUST certification. These measures not only reduce risk but can also lower premiums and improve coverage terms.
As AI becomes more embedded in healthcare, cyber insurance will play a vital role in helping physicians manage risk, maintain compliance, and protect patient trust. Contact OneGroup’s Healthcare team today for more information.
Sources
American Medical Association. (2023). AMA policy on augmented intelligence. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/ama-policy-augmented-intelligence
Fahim, Y. A., Hasani, I. W., Kabba, S., & Ragab, W. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: Clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives. European Journal of Medical Research, 30(848). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w
Lekadir, K., Frangi, A. F., Porras, A. R., Glocker, B., Cintas, C., Langlotz, C. P., … & Starmans, M. P. A. (2025). FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare. BMJ, 388, e081554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081554
Mello, M. M. (2025). Supportive structures for healthcare AI innovation and adoption. Testimony to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health. Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/assets/files/supportive-structures-healthcare-ai-innovation-adoption.pdf
Goktas, P., & Grzybowski, A. (2025). Shaping the future of healthcare: Ethical clinical challenges and pathways to trustworthy AI. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), 1605. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051605
Chou, D. (2025). The AI balancing act for healthcare CIOs. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidchou/2025/09/30/the-ai-balancing-act-for-healthcare-cios/
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. (2025). Artificial intelligence in predictive healthcare: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. https://www.devdiscourse.com/article/technology/3640532-ai-boosts-predictive-healthcare-yet-struggles-with-data-ethics-and-workflow-adoption
Huang, G., et al. (2023). Large language models outperform clinicians in estimating disease probabilities. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02423-2
Jiang, F., et al. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
TDWI. (2023). Healthcare Data Breaches: Trends and Impacts. TDWI Research.
Topol, E. (2019). Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books.
University of Minnesota. (2022). THREAT Database Study on Ransomware in Healthcare. School of Public Health.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device
Wachter, S. (2020). Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. Nature Medicine, 26, 463–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0858-1
Willis Towers Watson. (2023). Cyber insurance and AI: Managing emerging risks. https://www.wtwco.com/en-US/Insights/2023/06/cyber-insurance-and-ai
World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
This content is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing professional, financial, medical or legal advice. You should contact your licensed professional to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Please refer to your policy contract for any specific information or questions on applicability of coverage.
Please note coverage can not be bound or a claim reported without written acknowledgment from a OneGroup Representative.